Perdita Realizzata

Profitti e perdite / realizzato · Hub Indicatori CoinBoss

Loading…
Source: blockchain.info on-chain statistics, refreshed every 12 hours.

The ledger of capitulation

Realized Loss mirrors Realized Profit: it sums the losses locked in each day by coins spent below their cost basis — each contributing BTC × (creation price − spend price), counted only where the spend price is lower, in USD. This is a direct gauge of market pain: every dollar of realized loss corresponds to an actual act of selling underwater (or at minimum, an on-chain transfer below cost). Note this site plots losses as negative values extending downward — the deeper the water line, the heavier the day's capitulation.

The shape of panic

Realized loss carries its information in spikes. The everyday level is just scattered stop-outs within normal churn; a one-day eruption is a capitulation event — holders dumping at depressed prices in unison. Within this site's window the extreme printed in late March 2023 (the tail of the window's deep bear), with single-day realized losses exceeding $6 billion. The historical pattern, per the provider and broad on-chain consensus: the most violent realized-loss spikes cluster at bear-market bottoms and crash events — the climax of panic selling is frequently where sell pressure exhausts itself.

The relay from paper loss to realized loss

The classic capitulation sequence is fully traceable across three charts on this site: first Supply in Loss and UTXOs in Loss build for weeks (the underwater army swells); then a trigger detonates this page's realized-loss spike (paper losses convert to actual ones en masse); afterwards the underwater stock recedes through both price recovery and coin turnover. Conversely, in bull markets this page hugs the floor — nobody sells at a loss into strength — and minor spikes mostly reflect short-term traders stopped out in sharp pullbacks.

Methodology and limits

The symmetric caveats from the profit page hold: self-transfers and wallet migrations get miscounted as loss-taking (systematic overstatement); in-exchange capitulation never touches the chain (systematic understatement); the two biases point in opposite directions and don't neatly cancel, so treat absolute values as order-of-magnitude only. On the log axis, focus on the relative height and frequency of spikes. The metric also cannot distinguish panic selling from deliberate loss realization such as year-end tax-loss harvesting — check the calendar on extreme dates.
Beyond on-chain P&L, gauge market stress with live liquidations and the Fear & Greed Index.