잔액 10000 BTC 초과 주소 수

온체인 주소 / 보유 분포 · CoinBoss 지표 센터

Loading…
Source: blockchain.info on-chain statistics, refreshed every 12 hours.

The apex of the on-chain pyramid

This page counts addresses holding more than 10,000 BTC — single addresses worth billions of dollars at current prices. It is the top tier of the balance-cohort series, and the population is small enough to count by hand: between 83 and 121 addresses throughout this site's window. Only three kinds of entities live here: exchange cold wallets, consolidation wallets run by ETF custodians and institutions, and a handful of early super-whales or corporate treasuries. Notably, coins mined in the Satoshi era sit scattered across thousands of separate ~50 BTC addresses and never appear in this band — this curve is about modern institutional plumbing, not ancient legends.

A hundred addresses: you are reading operations, not markets

The 1,000-10,000 BTC band already reads like a roll call; this band is one entirely. A single address appearing or vanishing moves the curve by one full notch. And changes at the 10,000-coin scale are overwhelmingly operational: an exchange sweeping hot-wallet funds into cold storage (+1 here), or a custodian splitting one mega-wallet into several thousand-coin shards for risk control (−1 here, +10 in the band below). None of that says anything about market direction, yet it dominates the curve's short-term shape. Treating daily wiggles in this band as whale buy/sell signals is the single most common misreading of address metrics.

The window's steady shrinkage

Within this site's window (from July 2022) the count slid from a high of 121 in late November 2022 to a low of 83 in September 2025, and stands at 88 now. That contrasts sharply with the simultaneous expansion of the >100 BTC tier, and directionally matches two verifiable structural forces: the multi-year drain of exchange reserves (on-exchange supply fell to roughly 2.66M coins — see this site's exchange-holdings comparison pages), and custodians' preference for finer wallet shards, which drops mega-wallets out of this band when split. On-chain data alone cannot apportion the shrinkage among these causes; it can only confirm the shrinkage itself.

Usage advice

Three rules. First, read this band merged with the 1,000-10,000 BTC band (their sum is the >1,000 BTC cumulative tier, which has its own page here) — cross-band migrations cancel out and the combined trend is far more reliable. Second, when a step change appears, check for public records of exchange wallet reshuffling that day before entertaining other explanations. Third, the long-term direction works as a rough proxy for whether the chain's largest holding units are decentralizing: sustained shrinkage here alongside growth in the >100 BTC tier means large stacks are dispersing into finer custody units.
10,000+ BTC addresses are super-whale or exchange cold-wallet scale: extremely few (typically ~100), highly concentrated, and a single move may just be exchange wallet reshuffling — read alongside exchange reserve data.
Alongside on-chain distribution, track derivatives positioning via open interest and long/short ratios.